Post by account_disabled on Jan 3, 2024 4:51:34 GMT -3.5
Aor through a representative by post express courier or through a specialized communication service and the possibility of sending these documents by email or fax thus facilitating the rapid communication of procedural documents. . In this case as it appears from the documents in the file the author of the exception of unconstitutionality sent the procedural document by fax after the closing time of the courts work schedule. . Regarding the work schedule of the courts the Court notes that it is hours daily for days a week and usually starts at a.m. and ends at p.m. according to art. para. of.
The internal order regulation of the courts mentioned above. . Next the Country Email List Court observes that requests sent by email or fax do not benefit from the effects provided by art. para. of the Code of Civil Procedure according to which a procedural document filed within the deadline provided by law by registered letter at the post office or submitted to a fast courier service or a specialized communication service is considered to be filed within the deadline. While art. para. of the.
Civil Procedure Code expressly provides that the post office receipt as well as the registration or attestation made by the express courier service or the specialized communication service serves as proof of the date of submission of the document by the interested party in the case of documents of procedure sent by fax or email there is no similar provision. . of the transmission of procedural documents by fax or email is the certainty of their reception within the legal term by the court. In this sense the provisions of art. para. in conjunction with art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code according to which the means of communication must be able to ensure both the.
The internal order regulation of the courts mentioned above. . Next the Country Email List Court observes that requests sent by email or fax do not benefit from the effects provided by art. para. of the Code of Civil Procedure according to which a procedural document filed within the deadline provided by law by registered letter at the post office or submitted to a fast courier service or a specialized communication service is considered to be filed within the deadline. While art. para. of the.
Civil Procedure Code expressly provides that the post office receipt as well as the registration or attestation made by the express courier service or the specialized communication service serves as proof of the date of submission of the document by the interested party in the case of documents of procedure sent by fax or email there is no similar provision. . of the transmission of procedural documents by fax or email is the certainty of their reception within the legal term by the court. In this sense the provisions of art. para. in conjunction with art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code according to which the means of communication must be able to ensure both the.